Lifestyle Medicine Analysed – Poorly

An article in the British Journal of General Practice published online, on the 29th April 2021, sets out a mixture of support, disdain and implied ineffectiveness of the role that lifestyle medicine[1] has in the restoration and generation of human health. The direct journal response online allows only for 350 words. A fuller response is found below.

Medicina, Free Full-Text

Precision Medicine: New Paradigms, Risks and Opportunities - Knowledge at Wharton

Lifestyle Medicine: A Brief Review of Its Dramatic Impact on Health and Survival

Shared motivations, goals and values in the practice of personal science: a community perspective on self-tracking for empirical knowledge

Nutrients, Free Full-Text

The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT analysis) of

Benchmarking large language models' performances for myopia care: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Google Bard - eBioMedicine

Using mobile phones in healthcare management for the elderly - ScienceDirect

The bias that blinds: why some people get dangerously different medical care, Science

Lifestyle Medicine Analysed – Poorly

Time to set the record straight - what Lifestyle Medicine is, and what it is not - Australasian Society of Lifestyle Medicine

IJERPH, Free Full-Text

A Blueprint for Organizational Strategies To Promote the Well-being of Health Care Professionals