The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other

Por um escritor misterioso
Last updated 20 novembro 2024
The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other
Background A handheld metal noisemaker known as a “clicker” is widely used to train new behaviors in dogs; however, evidence for their superior efficacy compared to providing solely primary reinforcement or other secondary reinforcers in the acquisition of novel behavior in dogs is largely anecdotal. Methods Three experiments were conducted to determine under what circumstances a clicker secondary reinforcer may result in acquisition of a novel behavior more rapidly or to a higher level compared to other readily available reinforcement methods. In Experiment 1, three groups of 30 dogs each were shaped to emit a novel sit and stay behavior of increasing duration with either the delivery of food alone, a verbal stimulus paired with food, or a clicker with food. The group that received only a primary reinforcer reached a significantly higher criterion of training success than the group trained with a verbal secondary reinforcer. Performance of the group experiencing a clicker as a secondary reinforcer was intermediate between the other two groups, but not significantly different from either. In Experiment 2, three groups of 25 dogs each were shaped to emit a nose targeting behavior and then perform that behavior at increasing distances from the experimenter using the same three methods of positive reinforcement as in Experiment 1. No statistically significant differences between the groups were found. In Experiment 3, three groups of 30 dogs each were shaped to emit a nose-targeting behavior upon an array of wooden blocks with task difficulty increasing throughout testing using the same three methods of positive reinforcement as previously tested. No statistically significant differences between the groups were found. Results Overall, the findings suggest that both primary reinforcement alone as well as a verbal or clicker secondary reinforcer can be used successfully in training a dog to perform a novel behavior, but that no positive reinforcement method demonstrated significantly greater efficacy than any other.
The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other
Clicker Training 101: How it Really Works
The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other
Phishing for Long Tails: Examining Organizational Repeat Clickers
The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other
Is Clicker Training Better Than Verbal Training For Dogs? - The
The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other
Click and Always Treat? Or Not? - The Other End of the Leash
The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other
When clickers work – ILLIS ABC
The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other
Animals, Free Full-Text
The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other
Some detrimental effects of conditioned reinforcement on the
The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other
Clicker Training 101: How it Really Works
The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other
Justin Shaffer - Associate Dean of Undergraduate Studies
The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other
FluentPet Basic Vocab Kit - Set of 12 Recordable
The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other
Examination of the Accuracy and Applicability of Information in
The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other
Dog Training Treats – UltraCruz®
The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other
Examination of the Accuracy and Applicability of Information in
The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other
Multiple-Choice Questions for Teaching Quantitative Instrumental
The click is not the trick: the efficacy of clickers and other
Partial rewarding during clicker training does not improve naïve

© 2014-2024 phtarkwa.com. All rights reserved.